Every Augle session is published in full — the question, the finding, the confidence grade, every agent's contribution, and every Contrarian objection. Not summaries. The full structured record.
Browse the interactive session logThe record captures the ensemble's confidence grade, agent contributions, dissent, and Guardian integrity for every session.
"What does the evidence establish about the comparative effectiveness of GLP-1 agonists vs. bariatric surgery for long-term weight maintenance?"
"Do screen-time interventions reduce depressive symptoms in adolescents?"
"What does the evidence establish about the effectiveness of indoor masking mandates in reducing COVID-19 community transmission?"
"Is the CRISPR off-target editing rate reported in this foundational study reproducible?"
"Based on SEC enforcement patterns, what is the realistic exposure profile on the material non-public information question?"
"Does the evidence support the team's claim of commercially relevant photonic-chip inference throughput at competitive precision?"
"Do universal basic income pilots produce sustained labour-market participation effects?"
"What is the realistic technology-readiness level for room-temperature superconducting materials?"
The evidence does not support a directional comparative-effectiveness claim. Bariatric surgery shows comparable-to-larger and more durable weight loss in long-term observational cohorts, but no large long-term head-to-head randomised trial exists — the comparison rests on indirect evidence across materially different populations. The finding is Contested: the dispute is named and both positions preserved, rather than resolved into a false winner. Reopen condition: a head-to-head randomised trial with ≥3-year follow-up would move the grade.
Cartographer maps settled ground (both interventions produce clinically significant short-term loss), contested terrain (relative durability beyond three years), and unknown territory (outcomes in matched long-term populations).
Methodologist caps the comparative claim at Contested — no large long-term head-to-head RCT, indirect comparison only. Contrarian raises a Strong objection on population non-comparability. Guardian authenticates all 22 citations and flags one industry-funded extension.
Synthesizer produces a Contested finding that names the dispute and preserves both positions. Pragmatist declines a directional recommendation and proposes a follow-on session scoped to the head-to-head evidence gap.
A session addresses an open research question — academic, policy, legal, or clinical. The question and its scope are locked to the session record before deliberation begins.
Every agent output, every evidence node, every Contrarian objection, and every Guardian flag is written to the session transcript with a timestamp and agent attribution. The record is immutable after session close.
The Synthesizer produces an evidence-anchored finding graded Established, Probable, Contested, or Gap — bounded by the Methodologist's confidence ceiling. The grade is the finding, not a footnote to it.
Each finding carries structured reopen conditions: the specific new evidence, publication, or replication result that would move the grade. Uncertainty is made explicit, not hidden.
Sessions are published in full — question, finding, confidence grade, agent outputs, Contrarian objections, and Guardian flags. Every claim in the record is auditable against the source transcript.
Every session adds a structured record to the reasoning corpus: multi-agent deliberation, adversarial challenge, and calibrated confidence across domains. It is a dataset of how the system reasons — it exists only because the sessions ran.
Every session adds a structured record to the reasoning corpus — multi-agent deliberation, disagreement, adversarial challenge, evidence weighting, and calibrated uncertainty across research questions. At scale, this constitutes a dataset that does not exist anywhere else: how a structured ensemble reasons, argues, and quantifies what it does and doesn't know.
View the Deliberation Index →Join the waitlist — every session you run becomes part of the deliberation record.
One free Standard session with every new account.